FILE – The Minnesota State Supreme Court Building is shown in this Jan. 10, 2020, photo in St. Paul, Minn. Efforts to use the Constitution’s “insurrection” clause to prevent former President Donald Trump from running again for the White House are turnng to Minnesota with oral arguments before the state Supreme Court. Thursday’s hearing will unfold as a trial in a similar case plays out in Colorado. (AP Photo/Jim Mone, File)Katrina Pierson testifies remotely as Judge Sarah B.
Those lawsuits are among several filed around the country to bar Trump from state ballots in 2024 over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021,. The Colorado and Minnesota cases are furthest along, putting one or both on an expected path to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has never decided the issue.of the 14th Amendment bars anyone from holding office who previously swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it.
Trump’s lawyers noted that the former president has never been charged in any court with insurrection — although he does face“Both the federal Constitution and Minnesota law place the resolution of this political issue where it belongs: the democratic process, in the hands of either Congress or the people of the United States,″ they headtopics.com
Some of Trump’s main arguments are that Minnesota and federal law don’t allow courts to strike him from the ballot and that the insurrection clause doesn’t apply to presidents, anyway. “The riot that occurred at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was terrible. The January 6 rioters entered the Capitol for a few hours and fought with police. But as awful as the melee was, and as disturbing as the rioters’ actions were, it was not a war upon the United States,” they“Ultimately, Congress counted the electoral votes early the next morning. No evidence shows that the rioters — even the worst among them — made war on the United States or tried to overthrow the government.
The insurrection clause does not mention the office of president directly, but instead includes somewhat vague language saying it applies to the “elector of president and vice president. headtopics.com